Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ATKINS v. SECRETARY FDOC
as 4:2019cv00198
Respondent:
SECRETARY FDOC and MARK INCH
Petitioner:
JOSEPH W ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ATKINS v. SECRETARY FDOC
as 4:2017cv00176
Petitioner:
JOSEPH W ATKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY FDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ATKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2014cv00181
Petitioner:
HELEN ATKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00912
Petitioner:
Joshua Atkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv01620
Petitioner:
Joshua Atkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv01971
Petitioner:
Jewel Atkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Warden Atkins
as 1:2009cv21090
Plaintiff:
Tony Holmes
Defendant:
Warden Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holmes v. Warden Atkins
as 9:2009cv80605
Plaintiff:
Tony Holmes
Defendant:
Warden Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Atkins v. McNeil
as 1:2008cv23268
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Atkins
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atkins v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2007cv00275
Petitioner:
Simon K. Atkins
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
