Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lancaster v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00453
Petitioner:
Clyde Lancaster, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv02327
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Clyde Lancaster, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beasley, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00258
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Glenn Clyde Beasley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benjamin v. Ramirez
as 9:2018cv80327
Defendant:
Warden Gio Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Johnny Clyde Benjamin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2015cv00345
Petitioner:
Clyde Scott Thompson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCGEE v. CREWS
as 4:2014cv00510
Petitioner:
BERNARD CLYDE MCGEE
Respondent:
MICHAEL R CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOKES v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2013cv00568
Petitioner:
CLYDE STOKES
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2013cv00461
Petitioner:
Clyde A. Hayes
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STOKES v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2013cv00450
Petitioner:
CLYDE STOKES
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Althouse v. State of Florida
as 9:2013cv80384
Plaintiff:
Richard Clyde Althouse
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
