Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EVANS v. LOCKETT
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv02619
Petitioner:
ALFRED EVANS
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EVANS v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv02553
Petitioner:
HERBERT EVANS
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVANS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv01731
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EVANS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVANS v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2015cv01612
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVANS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2014cv01818
Petitioner:
WILLIAMS H. EVANS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVANS v. SAMUELS
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2013cv01160
Petitioner:
TIAYON KARDELL EVANS
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVANS v. DANIELS et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02123
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Respondent:
DANIELS, E. HOLDER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVANS v. SMITH
as 1:2008cv00372
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Defendant:
D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.