Cases 1 - 10 of 16
SPEIGHT-BEY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv03084
Plaintiff:
MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., MS. SAAD, LEONARD JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HATHAWAY v. US PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01094
Petitioner:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Respondent:
US PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SQUIRE v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2014cv01396
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SQUIRE
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., NANCY WARE and YOLANDA STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01515
Petitioner:
RONNIE LAMONT COLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRIS v. FAUST et al
as 1:2013cv01404
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LLOYD MORRIS
Respondent:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and THOMAS N. FAUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROOKS v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. BROOKS
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., THOMAS N. FAUST, GREGORY FUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMSEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2012cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. , THOMAS N. FAUST and US PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANDERSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ANDERSON
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MONROE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv00558
Petitioner:
SYLVESTER L. MONROE
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2012cv00509
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL A. STEWART
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
