Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Marshall v. English
as 5:2019cv03113
Respondent:
N. C. English
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marshall and Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Thomas et al
as 5:2019cv03027
Petitioner:
Ronald David Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service and Linda Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith (ID 74848) v. United States Marshal
as 5:2015cv03079
Petitioner:
Todd Carlton Smith
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. United States Marshal
as 5:2012cv03171
Petitioner:
Kishen Woods
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hale v. Morehead et al
as 5:2010cv03236
Petitioner:
Donell D. Hale
Respondent:
Terra Morehead, United States District Court, United States Marshal's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Richardson et al
as 5:2010cv03207
Petitioner:
Robert E. Green
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Swierzbinski v. Attorney General of United States et al
as 5:2010cv03059
Petitioner:
Artur Jozef Swierzbinski
Respondent:
Attorney General of United States, Secretary of State, United States Attorney District of Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03226
Petitioner:
Michael A Banks
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson, Correctional Corporation of America and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hawkes v. United States Marshals
as 5:2008cv03197
Petitioner:
John LeRoy Hawkes
Respondent:
United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03195
Petitioner:
Nicholas Warner Jones
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
