Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Escalante v. Droege
as 5:2024cv03079
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Respondent:
Charles Droege
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner:
Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escalante v. Burmaster et al
as 5:2023cv03232
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Respondent:
Paul W. Burmaster and Robert Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escalante v. Burmaster et al
as 5:2023cv03195
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Respondent:
Paul William Burmaster and Robert Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escalante v. Burmaster et al
as 5:2023cv03193
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Respondent:
Paul Burmaster and Robert Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Cheeks
as 5:2022cv03150
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
Chandler Cheeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fisher (ID 105409) v. Schnurr
as 5:2022cv03106
Petitioner:
Matthew T. Fisher
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Skidmore
as 5:2022cv03055
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
(fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Skidmore
as 5:2022cv03046
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
(fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Meyer
as 5:2022cv03023
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
Neosho County District Court and Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.