Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Williams v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00391
Petitioner:
Terrance E. Williams
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Russell, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lujan v. NDOC, et al
as 22-15098
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL VINCENT LUJAN
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER and CHARLES DANIELS
Carden v. NDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00683
Petitioner:
Chance B. Carden
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Northern Nevada Correctional Center Administration and James Stogner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carden v. NDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00684
Petitioner:
Chance B. Carden
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison, Medical Department, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Page v. Northern Nev. Cor. Center et al
as 3:2016cv00600
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Northern Nevada Correctional Center
Petitioner:
Daniel Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munoz v. Coxs et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, James G. Coxs, Nevada Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Peter J. Munoz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balboni, Jr. v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional Center et al
as 3:2011cv00458
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Balboni, Jr.
Respondent:
Nevada, State Of and Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Riker v. James Benedetti, et al
as 11-55642
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT RIKER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional Center, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
