Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Demarest v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00075
Petitioner:
Richard B. Demarest, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORRIS v. SPIVEY
as 3:2012cv00434
Petitioner:
WILLIAM KEITH NORRIS, II
Respondent:
RICHARD B SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strickland v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv00322
Petitioner:
Richard B. Strickland
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. HOLDER
as 4:2009cv00510
Petitioner:
JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ERIC H HOLDER, JR, JANET NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL ROZOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LaPomarede v. US Attorney General et al
as 8:2009cv01121
Plaintiff:
Guy Robert LaPomarede
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Janet Napolitano, Michael Rozos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Philogene v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 8:2009cv01042
Petitioner:
Wilney Philogene
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Michael Rozos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lin v. Attorney General, USA et al
as 8:2008cv01865
Petitioner:
Shou Rong Lin
Respondent:
Attorney General, USA, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Michael Rozos and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Attorney General, USA et al
as 8:2008cv01684
Petitioner:
Diane E. Johnson
Respondent:
Attorney General, USA, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Michael Rozos and others
Defendant:
Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
