Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ROSARIO v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2021cv00226
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
JEFREY ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 6:2016cv02230
Petitioner:
Juan Rosario
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00209
Petitioner:
Gerardo N. Rosario
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario-Andino v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2015cv00268
Petitioner:
Daniel Rosario-Andino
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario-Andino v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv03056
Petitioner:
Daniel Rosario-Andino
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2008cv60058
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosario v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2007cv00050
Petitioner:
Randy Rosario
Respondent:
Donovan Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.