Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Anthony T. Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hodges v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2020cv00099
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
Harold T. Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pattioay v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2018cv00462
Respondent:
State of Hawaii and Warden T. Thomas
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
Matthan James Simons Pattioay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kehano v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Petitioner:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Respondent:
Francis X. Sequeira, Richard T. Bissen, Davelynn M. Tengan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00444
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Fuller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kim v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Petitioner:
Rodney H.S. Kim
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Probation Office, T. J. Mahoney & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Travis v. McGrew
as 1:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Bruce Robert Travis
Respondent:
Linda T. McGrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Razo vs. Thomas, et al.
as 1:2009cv00452
Petitioner:
Vince William Razo
Respondent:
T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Razo v. Thomas
as 1:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
Vince William Razo
Respondent:
T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pangelinan v. McGrew
as 1:2008cv00553
Petitioner:
John S. Pangelinan
Respondent:
Linda T. McGrew
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
