Cases 1 - 10 of 47
KEARNEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv02861
Petitioner:
DONNELL SHAMOND KEARNEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FISHER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00584
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
NORRIS LYNN FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DUNCAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv01024
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. DUNCAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00651
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROBERT MOORE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NYENEKOR v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv00206
Petitioner:
CARPEAH RUDOLPH NYENEKOR, SR.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv02124
Petitioner:
LARRY HALL
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DENOYER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner:
DALE ERNEST DENOYER
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALLAH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2016cv00408
Petitioner:
RATEEK ALLAH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR and WARDEN OF ESTILL F.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Petitioner:
GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARRON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2015cv01829
Petitioner:
HERIBERTO EDUARDO MARRON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
