Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cosgray v. Massingill
as 2:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
David William Cosgray
Respondent:
Billy Massingill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Veck v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 1:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
William S. Veck
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. LNU et al
as 1:2021cv00599
Respondent:
C.N.M.C.F. and FNU LNU
Petitioner:
William Paul Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Betancourt Barco et al v. Price et al
as 2:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence and others
Plaintiff:
Rando Betancourt Barco, Michel Fuentes Luis and Luis Alfonso Mejia Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grosse v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
William Grosse
Defendant:
Christopher Barela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinzo v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv00228
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Hinzo
Respondent:
Derek Williams and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Petitioner:
Frank Martinez
Respondent:
Derrick Williams and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riley v. Janecka et al
as 2:2012cv00715
Plaintiff:
William Riley
Defendant:
James Janecka and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zamora v. Hatch
as 1:2011cv00501
Plaintiff:
William Zamora
Defendant:
Timothy Hatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobs v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Petitioner:
Shawn Louis Jacobs
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo , Joe R Williams and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
