Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCallum v. Westchester County
as 1:2019cv01178
Respondent:
Westchester County
Petitioner:
Tyron McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carl v. Westchester County Court
as 1:2018cv09795
Respondent:
Westchester County Court
Petitioner:
Kim Carl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burns v. Warden, Westchester County Jail
as 1:2018cv06792
Respondent:
Warden, Westchester County Jail
Petitioner:
George Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carl v. Westchester County Court People
as 1:2018cv06675
Defendant:
Westchester County Court People
Plaintiff:
Kim Carl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Westchester County Jail
as 1:2018cv05098
Petitioner:
Wilson Miller
Respondent:
Westchester County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Westchester County Jail
as 1:2018cv04310
Petitioner:
Kristepher Daniels
Respondent:
Westchester County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paulzin v. Westchester County District Attorney Office
as 1:2015cv03687
Petitioner:
Wilenton Paulzin
Respondent:
Westchester County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Westchester County Supreme Court
as 1:2013cv03658
Petitioner:
Donald Mack Bennett
Respondent:
Westchester County Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pons et al v. United States of America - S.D.N.Y. et al
as 1:2013cv00637
Petitioner:
Armando D. Pons and Arcadia V. Escondo
Respondent:
United States of America - S.D.N.Y., Supreme Court of the County of Westchester and Westchester County Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bennett v. Westchester County Supreme Court et al
as 1:2011cv04313
Petitioner:
Donald Mack Bennett
Respondent:
Westchester County Supreme Court and New Rochelle Police Department and Scarsdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
