Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Horne v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00638
Petitioner:
William Henry Horne, IV
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cain v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01431
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
William Henry Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2020cv01027
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General, Florida Department of Corrections and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
William Henry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrd v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00276
Petitioner:
William Henry Byrd
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00922
Petitioner:
William Henry Byrd
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAIGE v. SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00025
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY PAIGE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Crews
as 0:2013cv62560
Plaintiff:
William Henry Thomas
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ringwood v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
William Henry Ringwood
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUDLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00375
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY DUDLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
