Cases 1 - 10 of 7,348
Abbott v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50388
Petitioner:
William R. Abbott
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv02211
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rojas v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04171
Petitioner:
Martin Valtierra Rojas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosenbaum v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01339
Respondent:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of FPC Pekin
Petitioner:
Aimee Lynn Rosenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morgan v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2024cv50382
Petitioner:
Jack William Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Velazquez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50379
Petitioner:
Isai Solis Velazquez
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv02176
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Petitioner:
Robert E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrett v. Greene
as 2:2024cv02215
Petitioner:
Brian L Garrett
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. RRM BOP et al
as 1:2024cv08392
Respondent:
RRM BOP
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Leuthold v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01323
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Nathan A Leuthold
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
