Cases 151 - 160 of 2,211
Sivak v. The State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
The State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staples v. Bonner Co. Medical and Jail Staff et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jason Staples and Jason Ryan Staples
Defendant:
Bonner Co. Medical and Jail Staff, Dr. Troy Geyman, Nurse Chuck French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevarez v. Dean
as 1:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Conrad Cesar Nevarez
Defendant:
Hon. Michael Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Idaho State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kevin F. Romero
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Institution and T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak and Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crist v. Clive et al
as 1:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Damon Victor Crist
Defendant:
M.D. Stuart Clive, Physicians Assistant Maloney, Unknown Nurses 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thies v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Thies
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Director Rienkee, Idaho State Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Antonio Neal
Defendant:
Warden Davis, DW Tyvan, Lane Chow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. The State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
The State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
