Cases 161 - 170 of 1,031
Henry v. Elofsson
as 5:2022cv03083
Plaintiff:
Bruce L. Henry
Defendant:
Avery Elofsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devore v. Neosho Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv03101
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Devore and Jerome Levi Devore
Defendant:
Neosho Police Department, Neosho Fire Department, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kansas, State of v. Somrak
as 5:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of
Defendant:
Alec S. Somrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brown v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03063
Petitioner:
Darren W. Brown
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Salina Municipal Court et al
as 5:2022cv03097
Plaintiff:
Kirk Franklin Williams and Brother Kirk Williams-Bey
Defendant:
Salina Municipal Court and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson (ID 93050) v. Wichita, Kansas, City of et al
as 5:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
Elgin R. Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Wichita, Kansas, City of, Gordon Ramsay and Kim Warehime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Blount County, Alabama, County of et al
as 5:2022cv03059
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Blount County, Alabama, County of, Jefferson County, Alabama, County of, Shawnee County, Kansas, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betts v. Spies
as 5:2022cv03074
Plaintiff:
LaRon Eugene Betts
Defendant:
James L. Spies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hayden et al
as 5:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Ryan Hayden and Maban Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Armond v. McCabria et al
as 5:2022cv04018
Plaintiff:
Ray L. D'Armond, Jr.
Defendant:
James McCabria and Douglas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
