Cases 171 - 180 of 3,342
HUNTER v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01869
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Defendant:
WARDEN, HEALTH SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR, JOHN DOE, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLIN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv02311
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ROB BONTA and RACHAEL NEWCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Defendant:
WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, A/W OF MEDICAL CENTRAL PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MISUMI v. MCKINNEY COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2022cv01870
Plaintiff:
EVELYN MISUMI
Defendant:
MCKINNEY COUNTY COURT and IMMIGRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABNER v. BURGESS
as 1:2022cv02041
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SHANNON ABNER
Defendant:
MARILYN BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHARD v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02228
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv01639
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC FLORIDA, CHARTED AS HOME RULE, CHAD CHRONISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. BRAZINGTON
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
BRAZINGTON MONICA J and MONICA J. BRAZINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. STEWART et al
as 1:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STEWART, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC FLORIDA, BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
