Cases 181 - 190 of 2,211
Farley v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Casey Farley
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitrell v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kitrell
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Morgan
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. United States, et al.
as 1:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Snyder
Defendant:
United States and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thies v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Thies
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Director Rienkee, Idaho State Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Idaho State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kevin F. Romero
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Institution and T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak and Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
