Cases 11 - 20 of 27
SIRLEAF v. CLARKE et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS, D.Y. KINSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02522
Defendant:
AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv02419
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and MARK WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
CLARK V. HAYES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
SMITH v. DAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
STRAIGHT, SAMANTHA L. ZAREK, RONALD MCDAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALENCIA v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00835
Plaintiff:
IGNACIO VALENCIA
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA and BRANDY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAAC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
WENDELL D. ISAAC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANCH-EL v. CLARK et al
as 1:2016cv01379
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BRANCH-EL
Defendant:
KARLA DEE CLARK, SUSAN R. WINFIELD and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANSEN v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv01254
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KELLY HANSEN
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, JOHN CLARK and PAUL M. O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY McCRAY
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JOHN CLARK, LUIS A. VELEZ, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
