Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Manchec v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv14400
Plaintiff:
John Manchec
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Keren Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackmon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Petitioner:
Nathanael Blackmon and Nathaniel Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, Lieutenant Cordero, Lieutenant Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, D.H.O. Carol, Assistant Warden Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ortiz Rodriguez v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2022cv21403
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortiz Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tonja Jefferson, M. Garcia, R. Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Purdue Pharma
as 5:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ortiz
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. ORTIZ et al
as 4:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
MARTHA PEREZ
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, A ORTIZ and E CARBONELI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. FBOP Religious Department et al
as 5:2021cv00597
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Ortiz
Defendant:
FBOP Religious Department, FNU Alba, FNU Ozokpor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heagney v. Knight et al
as 8:2021cv02713
Plaintiff:
William R. Heagney
Defendant:
Thomas Knight, Kurt Hoffman, Brandon Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Tony
as 0:2021cv61990
Plaintiff:
Otis Heard
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony and Seargant Victor Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
