Cases 11 - 20 of 261
Carmichael v. Gittere et al
as 3:2018cv00106
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James G. Cox, William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Anderson v. NDOC, et al
as 18-15263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, QUENTIN BYRNE, VALAREE OLIVAS and others
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Hendrix v. James Cox, et al
as 17-17047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, SHERYL FOSTER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
William Leonard v. Renee Baker, et al
as 17-16735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEONARD, AKA Bill Leonard
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, JAMES GREG COX, JONES and others
Kevin Fernandez v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 17-16525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LYNN FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Chioke Gadsden v. James Cox, et al
as 17-16159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHIOKE GADSDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES GREG COX, ELLIE EMMANUEL, JACK PALMER and others
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv04051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felton Matthews, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON L. MATTHEWS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 3:2017cv00132
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Cheryl Burson, S.L. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
