Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Tia v. Victory Ohana Does et al
as 1:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Victory Ohana Does, Lyle Antonio, HCF MISHU Floorboy DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Sakai et al
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Zack Morris
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Wes Munn, Jennifer Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wideman v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Reginald Wideman
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Ted Sakai, Phyllis Hironaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tierney v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael C Tierney
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Ted Sakai, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tierney v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael C Tierney
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Ted Sakai and Halawa Prison Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abordo v. Department of Public Safety (DPS) et al
as 1:2012cv00651
Plaintiff:
Edmund M. Abordo
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety (DPS) , Shari Kimoto, Ted Sakai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cocklin v. Torres et al
as 1:2012cv00557
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Cocklin, II
Defendant:
Latasha Torres , Lance M. Rabacal , Francis X. Sequiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grandinetti v. Sakai et al
as 1:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Francis A. Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Theodore I. Sakai, Ted Sakai and All Sakai Administration Officials, state employees.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierney v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Nolan P. Espinda, Ted Sakai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Rushing et al
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Pitts
Defendant:
Bill Rushing, Johnston and Ted Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
