Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 87
REYNOLDS v. DRIGGERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01782
Plaintiff: NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS
Defendant: WILLIAM DRIGGERS and DELORES F. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01285
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MASON et al
as 1:2015cv01196
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: MASON, ROBINSON, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHICHAKLI v. KERRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01152
Plaintiff: RICHARD A. CHICHAKLI
Defendant: JOHN F. KERRY , JACOB J. LEW and ADAM J. SZUBIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PIERCE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv01096
Plaintiff: WILLIAM J. PIERCE
Defendant: ALAN WILSON and DAN F. LANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOYA-MEDINA v. GAOUTTE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO LOYA-MEDINA
Defendant: DAVID GAOUTTE, SUSAN D. KNOX and JOHN F. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHICHAKLI v. KERRY et al
as 1:2014cv01856
Plaintiff: RICHARD A. CHICHAKLI
Defendant: JOHN F. KERRY, JACOB J. LEW and ADAM J. SZUBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. FAYETTE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv01297
Plaintiff: PERRY HARPER
Defendant: FAYETTE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and F. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. TURNER et al
as 1:2014cv01298
Plaintiff: PERRY HARPER
Defendant: F. TURNER and LARRY TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?