Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Clark v. Neven
as 2:2010cv00944
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pugh v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00405
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, T. Gregory, Eric Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzgerald v. State Of Nevada
as 3:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Marty Scott Fitzgerald
Defendant:
State Of Nevada, Nevada Department Of Corrections, Nevada Board of Commissioners of the NDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aytch v. Sablica et al
as 2:2008cv01773
Plaintiff:
Martinez Aytch
Defendant:
Cynthia Sablica, Lavonne St. Rose Atkins, Linda C. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Atkins-St. Rose et al
as 2:2008cv01332
Plaintiff:
George Scott
Defendant:
Lavonne Atkins-St. Rose, Cole Morrow, Larry W uest and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lunford v. Neven et al
as 3:2008cv00359
Plaintiff:
Darren A. Lunford
Defendant:
D.W. Neven, Isidro Baca, Bruce Bannister and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lunford v. Bannister et al
as 3:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Darren A. Lunford
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Chuck Scardin, D.W. Neven and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lunford v. Neven et al
as 3:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Darren A. Lunford
Defendant:
D.W. Neven, Bruce Banister and C.O. Capper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrendondo v. Nv Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv01313
Plaintiff:
Armis Arrendondo
Defendant:
Nv Dept of Corrections, D.W. Neven, Shaulis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saldivar-Ramos v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv00377
Petitioner:
Evodio Saldivar-Ramos
Defendant:
D.W. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
