Cases 31 - 39 of 39
ACKLES v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2013cv01907
Plaintiff:
MONEEK M. ACKLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, JOHN BOEHNER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADEAIROUS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MICHAEL HOROWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK P. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01044
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. YOUNG
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULKS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2013cv00938
Plaintiff:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHELE LEONHART and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GOLDER v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00900
Plaintiff:
ALAN WILLIAM GOLDER
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ALBERTO GONZALES, PATRICIA REEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J. RICHARDSON, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, S. ELLIOTT, SANDY SPAGNOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2009cv01672
Plaintiff:
RODERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEEMS v. STEPHENS et al
as 1:2007cv01140
Plaintiff:
TONY WEEMS
Defendant:
JAY B. STEPHENS, WANDA BRYANT, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
