Cases 41 - 50 of 2,085
Sanders et al v. Medical Doctors Viva - Sanchez et al
as 6:2018cv00769
Plaintiff:
J.Z. Christian Sanders, Christina Hail DeBond, J.L. Hail-Morris and others
Defendant:
Medical Doctors Viva - Sanchez, Perez-Lugo, Filingane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Name Agents et al
as 6:2018cv00698
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Name Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2018cv00337
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2017cv02127
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv01908
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin, Roger v. Randa, Rudolf et al
as 3:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Rudolf Randa , Thomas Wilmouth, Stephen Ingraham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv01595
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
