Cases 501 - 510 of 3,346
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2020cv00210
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BALLOW v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00245
Plaintiff:
HARRIS BALLOW
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCNAIR v. GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL and GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEFFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00467
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD, BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ALONZO SHEFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. ADMINISTRATE REPRESENTATIVES
as 1:2020cv00469
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATE REPRESENTATIVES
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2020cv00185
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2020cv00188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNHILL v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
Plaintiff:
SEAN MICHAEL BARNHILL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WRIGHT v. APPLICATION TO INDIVIDUAL JUSTICE
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
APPLICATION TO INDIVIDUAL JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
