Cases 51 - 60 of 120
Mitchell v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv00499
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Tarz Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Downing v. Graves et al
as 2:2012cv00332
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Brian Connett, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Downing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 12-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
Burgess v. Sandaval et al
as 3:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Marshall Burgess, Jr.
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez-Masto, James G. Cox, E.K. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almy v. Davis et al
as 2:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Defendant:
J. Button, D. Davis, Fancher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall Burgess, Jr. v. USDOJ, et al
as 11-18035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL BURGESS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General, PAM DEL PORTO, Inspector General and others
David Johnson v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 11-17428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ROSS MILLER, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO and others
Bradberry v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00668
Defendant:
Christopher Aten, James Baca, Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bradberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Hicks v. David Roger, et al
as 11-17188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROGER, JIM GIBBONS, JACK PALMER and others
Irive v. Cortez-Masto et al
as 3:2011cv00574
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez Masto, James Cox, Secretary of State Ross Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Irive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
