Cases 61 - 70 of 3,343
NELSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2023cv01731
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZIMMERMAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
TERRY GEORGE ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02223
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLIS et al v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
RONALD HILLIS and CALVIN GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION and OREGON STATE BAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. FBI et al
as 1:2023cv01640
Plaintiff:
VINCENT WILSON
Defendant:
FBI, KERRY, FACEBOOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEYS v. CONNORS et al
as 1:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
CLAY KEYS
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, JOHN DOES 1-2, HERIBERTO TELLEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLDEN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS
as 1:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
DONNELL T. BOLDEN
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DESENBERG v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
ROGER MARX DESENBERG
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBLE v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS, CARINA LAGUZZI, DENNIS MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
