Cases 71 - 80 of 134
Blanc v. Pocatello Women's Correctional Center et al
as 4:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Blanc
Defendant:
Pocatello Women's Correctional Center, Brent Reinke, Jim Woolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brakke v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Randolph E Brakke, Sr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections , ISCI, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Cherry v. Dewayne Shedd, et al
as 11-35795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN A. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEWAYNE SHEDD, JEFF KIRKMAN, RANDY HIGGINS and others
Rhoades v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
Paul Ezra Rhoades
Defendant:
Brent Reinke , Randy Blades and Does 1-50, Unknown Executioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Noble Banks
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Renae LP James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 11-35763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, JOHN FERGUSON, CEO, CCA, IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Maschek v. Valdez et al
as 3:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Spencer Maschek
Defendant:
Philip Valdez, Norma Rodriguez, Christopher Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanc et al v. Reinke et al
as 4:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Blanc, Sandy Jonas, Kathryn Vann and others
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Jim Woolf, LeeAnne Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Diggs
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Johanna Smith, Shell Wamble-Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
