Cases 71 - 80 of 382
Mazak v. William et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Defendant:
Farmer William, Bill Farmer, Daniel Elias and others
Plaintiff:
Steve H Mazak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helgeson v. Pryor et al
as 0:2022cv60830
Plaintiff:
Daniel Quinn Helgeson
Defendant:
Harold F. Pryor and Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovingood v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Daniel K. Lovingood
Respondent:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovingood v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv20957
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Lovingood
Defendant:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Lopez
as 8:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Jesusadelaida Lopez
Defendant:
Daniel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Warden et al
as 8:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lorenzo Jackson
Defendant:
Warden, Harvey S. Ruvin, Carlos J. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dumond v. Miami Dade Police Department Midwest Division
as 1:2022cv20562
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Miami Dade Police Department Midwest Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond v. Miami Dade Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2022cv20566
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Miami Dade Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond v. Montoya
as 1:2022cv20565
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Paz G. Montoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond v. Rodriguez
as 1:2022cv20561
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez and Paz G. Montoya
Consolidated Defendant:
Miami Dade Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
