Cases 71 - 80 of 261
Chioke Gadsden, et al v. Tara Carpenter, et al
as 14-16250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHIOKE GADSDEN and NATHAN PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TARA CARPENTER, STEPHEN CLARK, JAMES GREG COX and others
Edward Seely v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 14-16162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NDOC BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS, BRIAN SANDOVAL and others
Hatlen v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00318
Defendant:
Greg Cox, Legrand and McDaniels
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatlen v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00317
Defendant:
Baker, Byrne, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatlen v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00316
Defendant:
Byrne, Greg Cox, Dr Koehn and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acox v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
Billy Acox
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Greg Cox, R. Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seely et al v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Andre' D. Boston, J. Castro, D. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00213
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Greg Cox, Dr. Michael Koehn and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00205
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Greg Cox, Sheryl Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
