Cases 71 - 80 of 340
VOTH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00413
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. VOTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SHEFFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00467
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD, BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ALONZO SHEFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03859
Plaintiff:
MOUSEN Y. ADEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. WILSON et al
as 1:2019cv03766
Defendant:
PATRICK SCRUGGS, COHEN, LUX and others
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA A. ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03614
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03282
Defendant:
INDIANA COURT OF APPEAL, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03402
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KURT R. MADSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAKUBA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03300
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUSENBERRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
as 1:2019cv02716
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS and NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT THOMAS CHRISTIAN, MATT MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02717
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS and BERWYN ROBINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
