Cases 1 - 10 of 69
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTHOKA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
ROZINA KIMANI MUTHOKA and ROZINA RHONDA JONES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNION STATES, MISSOURI STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. BULLARD et al
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
MARQUEION JAMAL HARRISON
Defendant:
BULLARD, STEPHEN JACOBS, LEGGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
MILLER AND CHEVALIER CHARTERED, MARIA JONES, MARY LOU SOLLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEROME MILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES, JR. v. PREGERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00710
Defendant:
LEE, XAVIER BECERRA, DEAN PREGERSON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY A. JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NELSON
as 1:2020cv00544
Defendant:
ALLISON JOYCE NELSON, NELSON, SASAN NEE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PERKINS et al
as 1:2019cv03168
Defendant:
TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM, ELBERT GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
