Cases 1 - 10 of 12
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Defendant:
J. Fox, Chris Synsvoll, SIS Tech Kerri Lewis-Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koch v. Marquette et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Marquette, True, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter-Bosdale v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv00599
Plaintiff:
Richard Antonio-Hill Baxter-Bosdale
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, BOP Government, The and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vianez v. BOP et al
as 1:2018cv02297
Defendant:
BOP and Denver Court Mayor
Plaintiff:
Juan Vianez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasco v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2015cv02756
Plaintiff:
Ismael Lee Velasco
Defendant:
Hernandez, Maldonado, M.A. Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv02627
Plaintiff:
Antoine M. Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Shumard et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
Carl Hall
Defendant:
Shumard, John Oliver and Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crump v. Central Office of General Counsel and Bureau of Prisons Federal North et al
as 1:2015cv01659
Plaintiff:
Norvell Webster Crump
Defendant:
Central Office of General Counsel and Bureau of Prisons Federal North, Central Regional Office, Agencie(s) of Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Administrations and Administrative Maximum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
