Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SHABAZZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT SUPERVISION OFFENDER SERVICES AGENCY et al
as 1:2019cv00241
Defendant:
CAROLYN SHELTON, STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, JENNIFER COUNTS-WURIE and others
Plaintiff:
MAHDI M. SHABAZZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEAD v. LAMBERTH et al
as 1:2018cv01111
Defendant:
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARRY WEIGAN, III and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRI v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01193
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS R. FERRI
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv01642
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAIR v. KOLBEN et al
as 1:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE MCNAIR
Defendant:
CAROLYN KOLBEN and CAROL A. BLUME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
JOHNSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GARDNER, JR. et al
as 1:2011cv02101
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
WENDELL P. GARDNER, JR., DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LANDLORD AND TENANT COURT, CAROLYN K. KOLBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROPP v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. STROPP
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, CAROLYN L. SIMMONS and R. D. CHARLTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
