Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hampton v The Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv02439
Plaintiff:
John Lafayette Hampton, III and John Lafayette Hampton, II
Defendant:
The Corporation doing business as USA doing business as State of Illinois, Third Judicial Circuit Court, Janet Heflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gray Television Group. Inc et al
as 1:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Bennie Anderson
Defendant:
Gray Television Group. Inc, Gray Media Group, Inc, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carpenter v. Pritzer et al
as 4:2020cv04161
Defendant:
Ajay Jetwani, Gregg Scott, Dr J R Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2019cv00882
Defendant:
Bob Allard, Austin Laster, IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv03044
Defendant:
K Calder, St. Johns Hospital, Dr. . Alloju and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv01333
Plaintiff:
Terrance Daugherty
Defendant:
J. Baldwin and Jhon Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Doe et al
as 3:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Terrance Daugherty
Defendant:
John Doe and J Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Doe et al
as 3:2017cv03153
Plaintiff:
Terrance Daugherty
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Corey L Fox
Defendant:
John Ross Daugherty and John Ross Daugherty Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villarreal v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Juan Villarreal
Defendant:
John Doe, City Of Bloomington/Bloomington Police Department, Troy L Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
