Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shabazz v. Pepper Hamilton, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01778
Defendant:
Frank Pennel, Pierce, Ron Hosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Haqq Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dignan v. Medical Dept. at J.T.V.C.C. et al
as 1:2018cv01403
Defendant:
Connections, Medical Dept. at J.T.V.C.C. and Director Matthew Wolford
Plaintiff:
Frank Dignan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00931
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, David Pierce, John Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLeod v. Brady et al.
as 1:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Steven A. McLeod
Defendant:
M. Jane Brady, Sharon Agnew, Susan Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hans Scheing et al v. Officer Casey Fountain et al
as 1:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Hans Scheing and Tina Webb-Scheing
Defendant:
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Officer Casey Fountain, Daniel Albanese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neff v. State of Maryland et al.
as 1:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Neff
Defendant:
State of Maryland, ECI-E Prison Warden, Wexford Medical Inc Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardwick v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Hardwick
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samans v. Pennell et al
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ryan S. Samans
Defendant:
Frank Pennell, David Pierce and Craig Brumbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
