Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Flowers v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Dukhan D. Flowers
Defendant:
Larimer County Detention Center, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2021cv02714
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Eugene Owens
Defendant:
Siobhan Burtlow, Joshua Lessar, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henard v. Columbine Towers et al
as 1:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
Bobby Henard
Defendant:
Columbine Towers, Carmen, Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Correctional Health Partners et al
as 1:2019cv03586
Defendant:
Kirk M Taylor, Steven Dawson, Physician Health Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Kautz et al
as 1:2019cv02924
Defendant:
Jane Doe, K Newcombe, Emmerich and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snorsky v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv03025
Defendant:
S. Sturgeon, R. Neff, Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
John Standley Snorsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Fremont, The et al
as 1:2018cv02968
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Ty (I) Martin, Board of County Commissioners of the County of Fremont, The and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Faircloth
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch, CDOC Chief Medical Doctor or Officer 'John or Jane Doe' and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bueno v. Houron et al
as 1:2018cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael Bueno
Defendant:
Houron, Hekush, Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broach v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv02791
Plaintiff:
William G. Broach
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
