Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Country Stevens v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 14-16146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COUNTRY JOE STEVENS, AKA Singing Horse
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, DONALD HELLING, JIM BENEDETTI and others
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 12-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
Deeds v. Bannister et al
as 3:2011cv00351
Defendant:
J. Bruce Bannister, Jim Benedetti, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Deeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 11-15036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
Stevens v. Carrol et al
as 3:2010cv00277
Defendant:
James Baca, Jim Benedetti, David Carrol and others
Plaintiff:
Country Joe Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Benedetti et al
as 3:2010cv00207
Defendant:
James Baca, Jim Benedetti, Chuck Fournier and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 09-17630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
Country Stevens v. Howard Skolnick, et al
as 09-16876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COUNTRY JOE STEVENS, AKA Singing Horse
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNICK, DONALD HELLING, JIM BENEDETTI and others
Franco v. NDOC et al
as 3:2009cv00430
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Franco
Defendant:
NDOC, Jim Benedetti, J. Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Skolnik et al
as 3:2009cv00227
Plaintiff:
Country Stevens
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, Donald Helling, Jim Benedetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.