Cases 1 - 10 of 32
DESENBERG v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
ROGER MARX DESENBERG
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODSON v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01865
Petitioner:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HULTZ v. GRAY V. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
as 1:2020cv01733
Plaintiff:
ROGER HULTZ
Defendant:
GRAY V. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00982
Defendant:
THOMAS B. GRIFFITH, BERYL A. HOWELL, ROYCE C. LAMBERTH and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL K. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY JR. v. HASKETT et al
as 1:2020cv00806
Defendant:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, GENARO GARCIA LUNA, PATRICIA ESPINOZA CANTELLANO and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHARLES DAY JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINGLE v. WORTON et al
as 1:2019cv03691
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. NASH and JAMES D. WORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2019cv03422
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHARLES DAY and ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
KENNEDY v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2018cv02559
Defendant:
PHIL BRYANT, HALEY BARBOUR and ROGER WRUCK
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON S. KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 1:2018cv01810
Defendant:
PHIL BRYANT, ROGER WRUCK, PELICIA HALL and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLZE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2017cv02858
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ROGER BOLZE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
