Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Rivera v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Robert May, Tasha Hollingsworth, Lt. Daum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woloshin et al
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones and Quinton
Defendant:
Natalie S. Woloshin, Patrick J. Collins, Eric H. Zubrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woloshin et al
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Natalie S. Woloshin esq., Patrick J. Collins esq., Eric H. Zubrow esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woloshin, et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkell v. Roberts et al
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
Daniel Roberts, Steven Anderson and Christopher Senato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baran v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Baran
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Mears
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Steven Hickman
Defendant:
Truman Mears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Donovan
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Steven Hickman
Defendant:
Richard Donovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Pepper Hamilton, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01778
Defendant:
Frank Pennel, Pierce, Ron Hosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Haqq Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2020cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Parker, Justin Erskine, William Brocklehurst and others
Defendant:
John Carney, Department of Correction, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
