Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Williams v. Baumgartner et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Karl Baumgartner, Campbell, Krina Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Owner of Vehicle, et al.
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Johnson
Defendant:
Owner of Vehicle, Nampa Police Officers, Ronald N. Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B-3-88-A, et al. v. Sileoni 98822
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
William B-3-88-A, Linzy, Thompson and others
Defendant:
Sileoni 98822
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frey v. Centurion Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jacob Spencer Frey
Defendant:
Centurion Health, Inc., Centurion of Idaho LLC, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
