Cases 1 - 10 of 71
WATSON v. WHITEFIELD
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
HEATHER WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watson III v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Marshall Watson III
Defendant:
State of Florida, f.c.c.c., GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Quinones et al
as 6:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jermetras Deangelo Watson
Defendant:
Chief Louis A. Quinones, Jr., Judge Tarlika Nunez-Navarro, Officer of Orange Co Dalton Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Defendant:
United States of America, John/Jane Doe, FNU Salem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watson v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 0:2023cv60958
Plaintiff:
Ervin Watson
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
James v. Watson et al
as 1:2023cv20493
Plaintiff:
Tony James, Jr.
Defendant:
Alfred A. Watson, Jorge Miyar, Lionel S. Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GOLDEN v. HOLMS et al
as 3:2022cv19114
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GOLDEN, JR
Defendant:
T HOLMS, HARPER L FORREST, WATSON TYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Marceno et al
as 2:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Tyree Earl Ford
Defendant:
Carmine Marceno, Smart Communications Holding, Inc., Vincent Amoroso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Suwannee Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Tyson N. Watson
Defendant:
Suwannee Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
