Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hamilton v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Terry Grissom, J B Pritzker, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00462
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Service, Christian Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Ryan Sutterer, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Kelly Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Batalid et al
as 3:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, John R. Baldwin, Mr. Batalid and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillum v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2019cv01231
Plaintiff:
Cortez Gillum
Defendant:
Angela Crain, M. Siddiqui, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv00991
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc., Tad Van Dyke, Daniel Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Laura Cunningham, Dee Dee Brookhart, Wexford Health Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jeffery Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sood et al
as 4:2018cv04030
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Williams
Defendant:
Kul B Sood, Lois Lindorff, R Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv50393
Plaintiff:
Harley T. Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Amber Allen and Marshon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01054
Plaintiff:
Shelby S Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Andrew Tilden, St. James Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
