Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Bender v. Subcontracting Concepts LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04776
Plaintiff:
Theodore Bender
Defendant:
Subcontracting Concepts LLC , John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Esteppe v. Body Sculpt International, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04407
Defendant:
Body Sculpt International, LLC, Body Sculpt International, LLC doing business as Sono Bello, Body Sculpt of Atlanta doing business as Sono Bello and others
Plaintiff:
Esteppe and Catherine Esteppe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Lee v. Hair Plus Trading Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03283
Plaintiff:
Fee Lee
Defendant:
Hair Plus Trading Co., Inc., Tae M. Lee, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Taylor v. Favor Market et al
as 1:2016cv02700
Plaintiff:
Melvin Taylor
Defendant:
Favor Market, Kyemyung Yang and John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Hurst v. Youngelson
as 1:2015cv03560
Plaintiff:
Brezzy Hurst
Defendant:
Steven M. Youngelson, WBY, Inc., Steven Shine and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
DUGGAN v. MMG INC et al
as 5:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
TAWANNA DUGGAN
Defendant:
MMG INC, PERSONAL APARTMENT MANAGERS INC, KINGSTON MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robbins v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Marcus Robbins
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Hensley et al v. S.G.T., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
E'lise Z. Hensley and Twana S. Mitchell
Defendant:
S.G.T., Inc., Darius Mitchell, M.P. Trey Hicks, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Drews v. Jobo's, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03774
Plaintiff:
Gary Drews
Defendant:
Jobo's, Inc., Robert Hamill, John Molinari and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Pearson v. Augusta, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
Melinda Beazley Pearson
Defendant:
Augusta, Georgia, Fred Russell, Bill Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
