Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Umana v. Papo's Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03741
Defendant:
Papo's 2, LLC, Papo's Express 2, Inc., Papo's Re Holding, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elmer Ernesto Umana
Mufti et al v. Figus Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00938
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Mufti and Osama Mufti
Defendant:
Kania Express, Inc. and Figus Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez v. Capri Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01621
Plaintiff:
Miguel Lopez
Defendant:
Capri Express, Inc. and Philip J. Salamone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v Oishi Asian Express Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02377
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Oishi Asian Express Inc and Renmin Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas E Perez v. New Chinatown Express Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02376
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
New Chinatown Express Inc and Renmin Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Araujo-Mojica v. Avocado Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04344
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Araujo-Mojica
Defendant:
Avocado Express Inc., Raul Rocha and Alix Melchor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Romero, Jr v. New China Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02305
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romero, Jr
Defendant:
New China Express, Inc., New China Express - OakLawn, Inc., Tim Cheong, individually and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Soto et al v. Vitran Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03811
Plaintiff:
Saul Soto , Gustavo Dominguez and Gonzalo Dominguez
Defendant:
Vitran Express, Inc. and Joseph Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ortiz v. Mediterranean Kitchens, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03814
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortiz
Defendant:
Mediterranean Kitchens, Inc, Pita Inn, Inc. and Pita Inn Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez v. Philly's Best Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01140
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Ramirez
Defendant:
Philly's Best Express, Inc. , Michael Markellos and Dean Markellos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
