Cases 31 - 40 of 312
Nasir v. Khokon et al
as 1:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Nasir
Defendant:
ABUL BASHAR KHOKON and Khokon Convenience Inc.
KELLER v. LITTLEFIELD CORPORATION et al
as 3:2023cv04808
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KELLER
Defendant:
LITTLEFIELD CORPORATION, PENSACOLA ONE INC., AHM SERVICES INC. and others
Cazares v. Beety Market Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Cazares
Defendant:
Beety Market Inc. and Ahmed Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thurmond v. Ocean Park Market Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv07849
Plaintiff:
Justin Thurmond
Defendant:
Ocean Park Market Corp. and Ahmed Alsaedi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BERNARD et al v. STRATEGIC DELIVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 1:2022cv07396
Plaintiff:
ARIEL BERNARD, THOM GRAY, JALONNE RICE and others
Defendant:
STRATEGIC DELIVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
AHMED v. NITIKA ENTERPRISE, INC et al
as 9:2022cv81910
Plaintiff:
ARAFAT AHMED
Defendant:
NITIKA ENTERPRISE, INC, SREEJA ENTERPRISE, INC, JESS PETROLEUM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Akter et al v. Immigrant Elder Home Care LLC et al
as 1:2022cv09868
Plaintiff:
Shapna Akter and Muhammad Alam
Defendant:
Immigrant Elder Home Care LLC, Ahmed Giash and Giash Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diaz v. A & M Tasty Snacks, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv07361
Plaintiff:
Felix Diaz
Defendant:
Utz Quality Foods, Inc., Utz Quality Foods, LLC, A & M Tasty Snacks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disla et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv06693
Plaintiff:
Delvy Disla, Ronnell Dusauzay, Justin Capote and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
