Cases 61 - 70 of 135
ONDISHIN v. MULTIBAND CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv07900
Plaintiff:
RONALD ONDISHIN, III
Defendant:
MULTIBAND CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BETHEA v. RAINBOW USA, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv07602
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BETHEA
Defendant:
RAINBOW USA, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SPANN v. D. JOHNSON FARMS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06165
Plaintiff:
JAVON SPANN
Defendant:
D. JOHNSON FARMS, INC., DAVE JOHNSON and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
HAMILTON v. COMPASSIONATE HEALTH CARE, INC
as 1:2015cv05894
Plaintiff:
DANYELLE HAMILTON
Defendant:
COMPASSIONATE HEALTH CARE, INC and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. T-JEM HOSPITALITY CORP et al
as 1:2015cv05893
Plaintiff:
WAYNE C SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
T-JEM HOSPITALITY CORP, MAURICE PALMER and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GUTJAHR et al v. LCR ACQUISITIONS CORP. et al
as 1:2015cv05627
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUTJAHR , LORRAINE CEMBRALE , FRANK MORETA and others
Defendant:
LCR ACQUISITIONS CORP. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RIVERA v. CAMDEN FLOORING CO. . et al
as 1:2015cv05269
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RIVERA
Defendant:
CAMDEN FLOORING CO., , ROBERT SWEIGART and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THOMAS v. FREEDOM PREP CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 1:2015cv04323
Plaintiff:
MELISSA THOMAS
Defendant:
FREEDOM PREP CHARTER SCHOOL and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CELENTANO v. DAN MARC APPLIANCE et al
as 2:2015cv04337
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CELENTANO
Defendant:
DAN MARC APPLIANCE , WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION , ABC CORPS 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
